What Football Can Learn from Rugby Refereeing: A Lesson in Respect and Authority

Football is the world's game—beautiful, passionate, and unifying. But for all its global appeal, one persistent flaw continues to taint its purity: refereeing. Unlike rugby, where officials command unwavering respect and maintain clear control over proceedings, football referees often find themselves at the mercy of player theatrics, incessant dissent, and a lack of real authority.

It begs the question: What can football learn from rugby when it comes to refereeing? The answer is clear—quite a lot.

The Culture of Respect

One of the most striking differences between football and rugby lies in the attitude toward referees. Rugby’s culture is built on respect for the official, a fundamental value ingrained in every player from a young age. Players address referees as "sir" and accept decisions without prolonged dispute. Football, on the other hand, has cultivated an environment where dissent is normalized—where players surround referees, scream for bookings, and attempt to influence decisions at every opportunity.

The impact? A loss of control and a growing sense that referees are merely participants in the circus, rather than the respected arbiters of the game.

In rugby, the referee is not to be questioned. Dissent is not tolerated. Arguing with the official results in immediate consequences, often in the form of a penalty or even a march-back of the ball—an elegant way of ensuring compliance. In football, however, referees are bombarded with protests for nearly every decision. Would a rugby-style approach change this? Absolutely.

Imagine a world where a referee moves a free-kick 10 yards forward every time a player moans about the decision. How quickly would the incessant whining stop?

Authority: The Referee as the Sole Judge of the Game

Rugby operates under Law 6, which establishes that the referee is the sole judge of fact and law during a match. Their authority is absolute, and players understand that. Football referees, however, are often treated as mere facilitators, with decisions challenged and undermined in real time.

Why is this? A key factor is the introduction of VAR, which, rather than reinforcing the referee’s authority, has sometimes weakened it. In rugby, the Television Match Official (TMO) works in conjunction with the referee, providing clarity without undermining their authority. Football’s VAR, by contrast, often creates confusion, delays, and even distrust in the official’s role.

A potential solution? Mic’d-up referees. Rugby referees wear microphones, allowing fans to hear their interactions with players and explanations of decisions. This simple addition fosters transparency and reinforces the referee’s control. It also prevents misinterpretation, as fans and players alike can hear why decisions are made. Football’s reluctance to introduce this system leaves too much room for speculation and controversy.

Consequences for Dissent: Football's Weakest Link

In rugby, a player berating the referee is not given the luxury of prolonged protests—he is penalized immediately, often with a yellow card and a 10-minute stint in the sin-bin. The idea that a player would follow the referee around the pitch in protest is laughable.

Football, by contrast, has created an environment where dissent is an almost expected part of the game. How often do we see players hounding referees after a foul? How frequently does a minor decision result in a mob of players waving imaginary cards?

If football truly wants to clean up its act, a rugby-style sin-bin system for dissent would be a game-changer. A 10-minute numerical disadvantage for a dissenting player would make managers furious, teammates resentful, and most importantly—players far less likely to engage in such behavior. A footballer is much less likely to hurl abuse at a referee if he knows he’ll be sitting out a crucial 10 minutes.

This wouldn’t be an experiment either—IFAB has already tested sin-bin rules at lower levels of football, but ultimately abandoned them due to a lack of enforcement. The issue isn’t the concept; it’s the willingness of football’s governing bodies to take bold action.

A Better System: Learning from Rugby

Implementing elements of rugby’s referee management wouldn’t just be a gimmick; it would fundamentally improve the game. Here’s how football could take inspiration from rugby:

1. Zero Tolerance for Dissent – Any arguing results in an immediate 10-yard penalty or sin-bin. Let’s see how much Neymar, Bruno Fernandes, or Grealish would protest then.

2. Referee Communication via Microphones – Transparency leads to trust. If fans and players hear why decisions are made, it removes ambiguity.

3. TMO (VAR) Decisions Called by the Referee, Not an External Room – Rugby’s TMO works seamlessly with the referee. In football, referees should be fully in control, explaining their decisions live.

4. Captains-Only Policy for Speaking to the Referee – In rugby, only the team captain has the right to approach the referee. This prevents the circus of multiple players arguing over every call.

5. Stronger Punishments for Simulating Dissent – Hounding referees, diving, and trying to manipulate decisions should result in retroactive bans. Football needs to start policing itself better.

The Reality Check: Does Football Have the Courage to Change?

Football’s governing bodies love to tinker with the rules—the handball law changes yearly, and VAR protocols remain inconsistent—but they refuse to tackle the biggest issue: discipline and respect for referees.

Perhaps the most frustrating aspect is that these solutions are already proven to work in rugby. Rugby remains a brutal, high-stakes, physically demanding game, yet its players maintain composure and respect for officials. Football is far less physical, yet the antics of players have reached embarrassing levels.

It’s time for football to grow up and learn from a sport that has successfully established a culture of respect, clarity, and authority.

For too long, we’ve accepted the sight of players screaming in a referee’s face as normal. It shouldn’t be.

Referees should be the guardians of the game, not the victims of it.

Football needs a referee revolution.

Join the Movement. We believe football should be played—and officiated—with grace, elegance, and respect. If rugby can maintain a culture of discipline and authority, why can’t the world’s biggest sport?

It’s time for football to raise its standards. Be part of the change.

Be a TENLEGEND®